Flite
Member
I'm curious why all the demand for the diesel other than the "cool" factor. I'm waiting for the JL to buy my first Jeep, I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that it will NOT be a diesel.
Sponsored
Diesels usually deliver excellent torque. And considering what a lot of owners use the Wrangler for, torque is even more useful than a lot of HP.I'm curious why all the demand for the diesel other than the "cool" factor. I'm waiting for the JL to buy my first Jeep, I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that it will NOT be a diesel.
I dont think so. There's been a ton of built up demand for a diesel Wrangler for years now. It's the type of car where diesel just makes sense -- it fits the image and also delivers the performance.Diesels usually deliver excellent torque. And considering what a lot of owners use the Wrangler for, torque is even more useful than a lot of HP.
I wonder though if this whole VW diesel scandal backlash will dampen diesel Wrangler sales.
In my experience, most Wrangler owners use them to drive back and forth to work.Diesels usually deliver excellent torque. And considering what a lot of owners use the Wrangler for, torque is even more useful than a lot of HP.
I wonder though if this whole VW diesel scandal backlash will dampen diesel Wrangler sales.
Definitely better torque. The EcoDiesel in the Grand Cherokee outputs 420 lb-ft compared to the Pentastar's 260 lb-ft.But I understand the designed purpose of the vehicle. It's an off-road vehicle. Even so, what advantages does the diesel offer?
There gets to be a point of diminishing returns though. I'll give it the torque advantage, but what is the point in a Wrangler? The number is there, but the real world result is a slower vehicle.Definitely better torque. The EcoDiesel in the Grand Cherokee outputs 420 lb-ft compared to the Pentastar's 260 lb-ft.
It also gets a few MPG better. 30 HWY MPG for the diesel vs 26 HWY MPG for the Pentastar in the Grand Cherokee
I think some of it has to do with image and perception. Diesel just fits the rugged SUV / truck image. Plus we've never had a diesel Wrangler before so there's the new and unique aspect to it.In my experience, most Wrangler owners use them to drive back and forth to work.
But I understand the designed purpose of the vehicle. It's an off-road vehicle. Even so, what advantages does the diesel offer?
I agree 100%. It's "cool", and based just on the cool factor, I'd want one too. I just wonder how many people will buy the diesel option and then sometime down the road wish they hadn't.I think some of it has to do with image and perception. Diesel just fits the rugged SUV / truck image. Plus we've never had a diesel Wrangler before so there's the new and unique aspect to it.
It's never about "need" tho is it? If they offer it as a choice there will be many who choose it and it has definite advantages on trails. The question is what your intended use is and it varies a lot among owners.There gets to be a point of diminishing returns though. I'll give it the torque advantage, but what is the point in a Wrangler? The number is there, but the real world result is a slower vehicle.
The chassis isn't meant to tow much, so regardless of the torque, it's still never going to be a good tow rig. Although maybe they'll make some chassis changes to the JK that allow it to tow more, specifically in the truck.
And finally, even with a moderate increase in MPGs, that's more than offset by the fact that diesel is more expensive than gas, it will require DEF, it will require fuel filter changes regularly, and oil change costs increase substantially.
If we were talking a simple diesel like the old Toyota Hilux, I'd be all in. But a modern diesel is a much more difficult decision. Unless you NEED one, I can't see the point in owning one. And the Wrangler just isn't a vehicle that will ever need one as far as I can tell.
I guess that's kind of where I'm coming from... there is no "need" for one for most people.It's never about "need" tho is it? If they offer it as a choice there will be many who choose it and it has definite advantages on trails. The question is what your intended use is and it varies a lot among owners.
If you are hitting trails, the diesel has massive low end torque advantage perfect for crawling. It also has better longevity although repairs are far more complicated and costly. If you are primarily on the road (and probably 90% are) the gas engine makes more sense. Don't underestimate the MPG increase with diesel either. My friend picked up a '14 diesel grand cherokee and loves it, getting 21 city and 28 highway.
Not necessarily. Good ole naturally aspirated diesels output tons of torque too. Like @RobNY said FCA's own V6 ecodiesel manages 420 lb-ft torque without use of turbocharging.Isn't it the use of forced induction often with diesels that are giving it the impressive torque and power delivery numbers? serious question.
There is definitely a turbo in modern diesels. The 3.0L Ecodiesel is no exception. See picture, that is a turbo in the back of the engine.Not necessarily. Good ole naturally aspirated diesels output tons of torque too. Like @RobNY said FCA's own V6 ecodiesel manages 420 lb-ft torque without use of turbocharging.